head to head · open source

utopia vs ctx

utopia has 9,245 GitHub stars, 1,035 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped today. ctx has 587 stars, 71 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. utopia leads on adoption by 1,475% (9,245 vs 587 stars). utopia is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; ctx is written in Python under MIT. utopia has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ctx 12%. utopia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (knowledge-graph, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

utopia ★ 9.2K ctx ★ 587 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

utopia ctx
GitHub stars ★ 9.2K ★ 587
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick utopia if

  • You weight community size — 9.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full utopia profile →

pick ctx if

  • You want the ctx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ctx fits your workflow better

full ctx profile →

About utopia

Utopia is the world's first open source enterprise world model: a self hosted knowledge substrate with a bitemporal graph and an ontology at its base layer, built by DeepLethe for teams that need agent memory, governed knowledge, and a trustworthy decision core running on hardware they control.

read the full utopia overview →

About ctx

ctx is a repo aware recommendation engine for AI coding configurations — skills, agents, MCP servers, and model harnesses — built for developers and platform teams who want the cheapest setup that reliably works on their own repository.

read the full ctx overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

utopia vs storybook utopia vs Understand-Anything utopia vs devdocs utopia vs docsify utopia vs wiki utopia vs mkdocs-material utopia vs BookStack utopia vs deepwiki-open utopia vs Docs utopia vs jsdoc utopia vs Skill_Seekers utopia vs gollum

Frequently asked questions

Is utopia or ctx more popular?

utopia has 9,245 GitHub stars and ctx has 587. utopia has the larger community by that measure.

Are utopia and ctx free?

Both are open source. utopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ctx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between utopia and ctx?

utopia is written in Rust and ctx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, utopia or ctx?

Choose utopia if you want the larger community (9,245 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ctx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.