head to head · open source

Docs vs utopia

Docs has 16,838 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 370 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. utopia has 9,245 stars, 1,035 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped today. Docs leads on adoption by 82% (16,838 vs 9,245 stars). Docs is written in Python under MIT; utopia is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Docs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, utopia 11%. utopia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (knowledge-base), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docs ★ 17K utopia ★ 9.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docs utopia
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 9.2K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docs if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docs profile →

pick utopia if

  • You want the utopia feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and utopia fits your workflow better

full utopia profile →

About Docs

Docs is an open source collaborative text editor for creating, editing, and sharing documents in real time. It lives in the open source documentation and knowledge base ecosystem, and it is built with Django and React for web native use. The repository describes Docs as a web native editor made for teams that need clean documents and sub documents without surrendering data to a hosted service.

read the full Docs overview →

About utopia

Utopia is the world's first open source enterprise world model: a self hosted knowledge substrate with a bitemporal graph and an ontology at its base layer, built by DeepLethe for teams that need agent memory, governed knowledge, and a trustworthy decision core running on hardware they control.

read the full utopia overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

Docs vs storybook Docs vs Understand-Anything Docs vs devdocs Docs vs docsify Docs vs wiki Docs vs mkdocs-material Docs vs BookStack Docs vs deepwiki-open Docs vs jsdoc Docs vs Skill_Seekers Docs vs gollum Docs vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is Docs or utopia more popular?

Docs has 16,838 GitHub stars and utopia has 9,245. Docs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docs and utopia free?

Both are open source. Docs is licensed under MIT and utopia under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docs and utopia?

Docs is written in Python and utopia in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docs or utopia?

Choose Docs if you want the larger community (16,838 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose utopia if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.