head to head · open source

Jitsi vs univer

Jitsi has 29,944 GitHub stars, 8,031 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. univer has 14,417 stars, 1,303 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped today. Jitsi leads on adoption by 108% (29,944 vs 14,417 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; univer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, univer 9%. univer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K univer ★ 14K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi univer
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick univer if

  • You want the univer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and univer fits your workflow better

full univer profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About univer

Univer is an open source, full stack office SDK for building spreadsheet, document and presentation interfaces inside your own product. Rather than shipping an end user office suite, it gives developers the primitives — a Canvas based renderer, a formula engine, a plugin architecture and a single Facade API — to embed spreadsheet and document editing into a web application or run the same logic headlessly on Node.js.

read the full univer overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton Jitsi vs hedgedoc

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or univer more popular?

Jitsi has 29,944 GitHub stars and univer has 14,417. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and univer free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and univer under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and univer?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and univer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or univer?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,944 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose univer if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.