head to head · open source
unifi-mcp vs synology-api
unifi-mcp has 1,005 GitHub stars, 134 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. synology-api has 608 stars, 168 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. unifi-mcp leads on adoption by 65% (1,005 vs 608 stars). unifi-mcp is written in Python under MIT; synology-api is written in Python under MIT. unifi-mcp has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, synology-api 28%. unifi-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| unifi-mcp | synology-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1.0K | ★ 608 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 134 | ⑂ 168 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick unifi-mcp if
- You weight community size — 1.0K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick synology-api if
- You want the synology-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and synology-api fits your workflow better
About unifi-mcp
UniFi MCP Leverage agents and agentic AI workflows to manage your UniFi deployment. Servers Cloud Relay Cloud Relay pairs the Cloudflare hosted Worker gateway with the Relay sidecar on your LAN. The Worker provides the authenticated edge MCP endpoint, Durable Object broker, multi location routing, token boundary, and deployment/management CLI. The Relay sidecar is a local MCP HTTP client and forwarder: it discovers configured local MCP servers over HTTP and maintains an outbound WebSocket to the Worker. Remote requests follow MCP client → Worker gateway → outbound WebSocket → Relay sidecar → local MCP servers…
read the full unifi-mcp overview →
About synology-api
Synology Wrapper If you find yourself here, most probably you are trying to develop something for your NAS, this wrapper might come to your help to build your script. I would like to specify that I do this for hobby as is my passion and in my little free time. Said this, there is no warranties chained and this library is provided "As Is", you will find many things can be simplified, and I slowly will but feel free to Contribute. Premise I've tried this wrapper only with python3 . I do not know if it actually runs with previous versions Before opening an issue make sure you do your own research, if you are not…
read the full synology-api overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is unifi-mcp or synology-api more popular?
unifi-mcp has 1,005 GitHub stars and synology-api has 608. unifi-mcp has the larger community by that measure.
Are unifi-mcp and synology-api free?
Both are open source. unifi-mcp is licensed under MIT and synology-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between unifi-mcp and synology-api?
unifi-mcp is written in Python and synology-api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, unifi-mcp or synology-api?
Choose unifi-mcp if you want the larger community (1,005 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose synology-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.