head to head · open source

Umami vs Lua.sh

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars, 8,053 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lua.sh has 340 stars, 65 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Umami leads on adoption by 11,337% (38,885 vs 340 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; Lua.sh is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Lua.sh 19%. Umami was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K Lua.sh ★ 340 category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami Lua.sh
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 340
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 65
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick Lua.sh if

  • You want the Lua.sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Lua.sh fits your workflow better

full Lua.sh profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About Lua.sh

Lua.sh is an open source, self hostable URL shortener built on Laravel, Vue 3, and Inertia.js, aimed at individuals and teams who want branded, trackable links running on infrastructure they control.

read the full Lua.sh overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible umami vs matomo umami vs rybbit posthog vs plausible posthog vs matomo posthog vs rybbit plausible vs matomo crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Matomo Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs Fathom Lite Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or Lua.sh more popular?

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars and Lua.sh has 340. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and Lua.sh free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and Lua.sh under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and Lua.sh?

Umami is written in TypeScript and Lua.sh in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or Lua.sh?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,885 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Lua.sh if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.