head to head · open source

Umami vs HitKeep

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars, 8,053 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HitKeep has 88 stars, 8 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Umami leads on adoption by 44,088% (38,885 vs 88 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; HitKeep is written in Go under MIT. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, HitKeep 9%. Umami was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K HitKeep ★ 88 category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami HitKeep
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 88
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 8
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick HitKeep if

  • You want the HitKeep feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and HitKeep fits your workflow better

full HitKeep profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About HitKeep

HitKeep is a 100% open source, MIT licensed, AI native web analytics platform written in Go that self hosts as a single binary with embedded DuckDB and NSQ, or runs as a managed cloud service in EU or US regions, and it is built for teams that want cookieless traffic, conversion, and AI visibility reporting under their own control.

read the full HitKeep overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible umami vs matomo umami vs rybbit posthog vs plausible posthog vs matomo posthog vs rybbit plausible vs matomo crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Matomo Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs Fathom Lite Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or HitKeep more popular?

Umami has 38,885 GitHub stars and HitKeep has 88. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and HitKeep free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and HitKeep under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and HitKeep?

Umami is written in TypeScript and HitKeep in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or HitKeep?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,885 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HitKeep if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.