head to head · open source

typia vs kiro-gateway

typia has 5,912 GitHub stars, 224 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kiro-gateway has 2,281 stars, 551 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. typia leads on adoption by 159% (5,912 vs 2,281 stars). typia is written in TypeScript under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. typia has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. typia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

typia ★ 5.9K kiro-gateway ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

typia kiro-gateway
GitHub stars ★ 5.9K ★ 2.3K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-05-18
Forks ⑂ 224 ⑂ 551
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick typia if

  • You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full typia profile →

pick kiro-gateway if

  • You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better

full kiro-gateway profile →

About typia

Typia is an MIT licensed TypeScript transformer library that compiles pure TypeScript types into super fast runtime validators and serializers, built for TypeScript and Node.js developers who want runtime type safety without writing or maintaining a separate schema.

read the full typia overview →

About kiro-gateway

Kiro Gateway is an open source proxy API gateway that turns the Claude and other models available inside Kiro IDE and Kiro CLI (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) into OpenAI and Anthropic compatible API endpoints, for developers who want to reach those models from any client.

read the full kiro-gateway overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

typia vs fastapi typia vs Hoppscotch typia vs Bruno typia vs Insomnia typia vs one-api typia vs OpenAPI-Specification typia vs openapi-generator typia vs redoc typia vs SafeLine typia vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF typia vs grpc-gateway typia vs Yaak

Frequently asked questions

Is typia or kiro-gateway more popular?

typia has 5,912 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,281. typia has the larger community by that measure.

Are typia and kiro-gateway free?

Both are open source. typia is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between typia and kiro-gateway?

typia is written in TypeScript and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, typia or kiro-gateway?

Choose typia if you want the larger community (5,912 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.