head to head · open source

Typebot vs Ethora

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars, 3,207 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Ethora has 546 stars, 111 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Typebot leads on adoption by 1,794% (10,341 vs 546 stars). Typebot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Ethora is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Typebot has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, Ethora 20%. Ethora was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Typebot ★ 10K Ethora ★ 546 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Typebot Ethora
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 546
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Typebot if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Typebot profile →

pick Ethora if

  • You want the Ethora feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Ethora fits your workflow better

full Ethora profile →

About Typebot

Typebot is Fair Source chatbot builder. Users create advanced chatbots visually. Chatbots embed in web and mobile apps. Results collect in real time. Project lives in self hosted chatbot, conversational bot, form builder ecosystem. Stack uses TypeScript, Next.js, TailwindCSS. GitHub topics include chat application, chatbot, conversational bots, form builder, nextjs, tailwindcss.

read the full Typebot overview →

About Ethora

Ethora is an Apache 2.0 licensed chat, AI and messaging SDK monorepo that adds real time messaging, prebuilt chat UI, bots and backend services to web, iOS and Android applications, and it is aimed at product teams that would rather integrate a messaging layer than assemble one.

read the full Ethora overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Typebot vs n8n Typebot vs ProxmoxVE Typebot vs ActivePieces Typebot vs LiveKit Typebot vs amis Typebot vs Windmill Typebot vs Botpress Typebot vs mitosis Typebot vs Automatisch Typebot vs puck Typebot vs cadence Typebot vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Typebot or Ethora more popular?

Typebot has 10,341 GitHub stars and Ethora has 546. Typebot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Typebot and Ethora free?

Both are open source. Typebot has no licence declared in this registry, and Ethora is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Typebot and Ethora?

Typebot is written in TypeScript and Ethora in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Typebot or Ethora?

Choose Typebot if you want the larger community (10,341 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Ethora if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.