head to head · open source
trustgraph vs f-flow
trustgraph has 2,869 GitHub stars, 339 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. f-flow has 541 stars, 66 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. trustgraph leads on adoption by 430% (2,869 vs 541 stars). trustgraph is written in Python under Apache-2.0; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. trustgraph has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. trustgraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (graph), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| trustgraph | f-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2.9K | ★ 541 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 339 | ⑂ 66 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick trustgraph if
- You weight community size — 2.9K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick f-flow if
- You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better
About trustgraph
HyperGraph Playground Self Host TrustGraph Docs YouTube Discord Website The Context Orchestration Layer for Agentic AI Open Source · Open Standards · Total Transparency TrustGraph is an open source context orchestration layer designed to power the next generation of enterprise AI. AI applications fail without shared context. LLMs are powerful, but without a structured, unified context layer — one that bridges silos, captures complex relationships, and enforces governance — agents hallucinate, violate policies, and produce non deterministic outcomes. TrustGraph builds that layer. It uses hypergraphs to turn raw…
read the full trustgraph overview →
About f-flow
Foblex Flow The most adopted node editor library for Angular — for production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors. Foblex Flow ships the hard parts of a production node editor — drag logic, hit testing, SVG connection paths, reassign, selection, zoom, and undo/redo — as Angular native building blocks. Begin with f flow , f canvas , nodes, and connections, then add richer editor features only when your product needs them. It powers production products such as Luware Nimbus, ProcessMIX, XpertAI, and EpicStaff. Use it to create workflow builders, AI low code tools, call flow editors…
read the full f-flow overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is trustgraph or f-flow more popular?
trustgraph has 2,869 GitHub stars and f-flow has 541. trustgraph has the larger community by that measure.
Are trustgraph and f-flow free?
Both are open source. trustgraph is licensed under Apache-2.0 and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between trustgraph and f-flow?
trustgraph is written in Python and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, trustgraph or f-flow?
Choose trustgraph if you want the larger community (2,869 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.