head to head · open source
teslamate vs unifi-mcp
teslamate has 9,230 GitHub stars, 1,041 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. unifi-mcp has 1,003 stars, 133 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. teslamate leads on adoption by 820% (9,230 vs 1,003 stars). teslamate is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0; unifi-mcp is written in Python under MIT. teslamate has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, unifi-mcp 13%. teslamate was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| teslamate | unifi-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.2K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Elixir | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 133 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick teslamate if
- You weight community size — 9.2K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick unifi-mcp if
- You want the unifi-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and unifi-mcp fits your workflow better
About teslamate
TeslaMate A powerful, self hosted data logger for your Tesla. Written in Elixir Data is stored in a Postgres database Visualization and data analysis with Grafana Vehicle data is published to a local MQTT Broker ⚠️ Security Warning [!CAUTION] Use Official Versions Only To protect yourself from malicious forks, malware, and data theft, please ensure you only obtain TeslaMate from the official source: Official Repository: Official Documentation: We have received reports of deceptive websites and unofficial mobile apps (e.g. on the App Store) using the TeslaMate name to distribute modified or harmful versions. If…
read the full teslamate overview →
About unifi-mcp
UniFi MCP Leverage agents and agentic AI workflows to manage your UniFi deployment. Servers Cloud Relay Cloud Relay pairs the Cloudflare hosted Worker gateway with the Relay sidecar on your LAN. The Worker provides the authenticated edge MCP endpoint, Durable Object broker, multi location routing, token boundary, and deployment/management CLI. The Relay sidecar is a local MCP HTTP client and forwarder: it discovers configured local MCP servers over HTTP and maintains an outbound WebSocket to the Worker. Remote requests follow MCP client → Worker gateway → outbound WebSocket → Relay sidecar → local MCP servers…
read the full unifi-mcp overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is teslamate or unifi-mcp more popular?
teslamate has 9,230 GitHub stars and unifi-mcp has 1,003. teslamate has the larger community by that measure.
Are teslamate and unifi-mcp free?
Both are open source. teslamate is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and unifi-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between teslamate and unifi-mcp?
teslamate is written in Elixir and unifi-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, teslamate or unifi-mcp?
Choose teslamate if you want the larger community (9,230 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose unifi-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.