head to head · open source

Teable vs Structr

Teable has 21,807 GitHub stars, 1,347 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped today. Structr has 830 stars, 161 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Teable leads on adoption by 2,527% (21,807 vs 830 stars). Teable is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Structr is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Teable has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Structr 19%. Teable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (low-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Teable ★ 22K Structr ★ 830 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Teable Structr
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 830
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Teable if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Teable profile →

pick Structr if

  • You want the Structr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Structr fits your workflow better

full Structr profile →

About Teable

Teable is a TypeScript based database and spreadsheet platform positioned as an open alternative to Retool and as an Airtable alternative. It combines PostgreSQL data management, AI workflows, app building, and team collaboration in one system, with a hosted version at teable.ai and self hosted options.

read the full Teable overview →

About Structr

Structr is an open source, generic low code development and runtime platform built on a graph database, aimed at developers and teams who need to model, build, and operate fully custom applications rather than configure a prebuilt product.

read the full Structr overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Teable vs ECC Teable vs react Teable vs Langflow Teable vs Supabase Teable vs puppeteer Teable vs archify Teable vs PocketBase Teable vs i-have-adhd Teable vs codebase-memory-mcp Teable vs ToolJet Teable vs AppSmith Teable vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Teable or Structr more popular?

Teable has 21,807 GitHub stars and Structr has 830. Teable has the larger community by that measure.

Are Teable and Structr free?

Neither Teable nor Structr declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Teable and Structr?

Teable is written in TypeScript and Structr in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Teable or Structr?

Choose Teable if you want the larger community (21,807 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Structr if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.