head to head · open source

Teable vs runtime

Teable has 21,859 GitHub stars, 1,353 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. runtime has 1,677 stars, 461 forks, 212 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Teable leads on adoption by 1,203% (21,859 vs 1,677 stars). Teable is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; runtime is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Teable has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, runtime 27%. runtime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Teable ★ 22K runtime ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Teable runtime
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 1.7K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 461
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Teable if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Teable profile →

pick runtime if

  • You want the runtime feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and runtime fits your workflow better

full runtime profile →

About Teable

Teable is a TypeScript based database and spreadsheet platform positioned as an open alternative to Retool and as an Airtable alternative. It combines PostgreSQL data management, AI workflows, app building, and team collaboration in one system, with a hosted version at teable.ai and self hosted options.

read the full Teable overview →

About runtime

E2B Runtime is the open source Go backend — control plane, Firecracker orchestrator, in VM agent, edge router, and template builder — that powers E2B's AI agent cloud and can be run by anyone on their own hardware.

read the full runtime overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 273K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Teable vs ECC Teable vs react Teable vs Langflow Teable vs Supabase Teable vs puppeteer Teable vs archify Teable vs PocketBase Teable vs i-have-adhd Teable vs codebase-memory-mcp Teable vs herdr Teable vs ToolJet Teable vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is Teable or runtime more popular?

Teable has 21,859 GitHub stars and runtime has 1,677. Teable has the larger community by that measure.

Are Teable and runtime free?

Both are open source. Teable has no licence declared in this registry, and runtime is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Teable and runtime?

Teable is written in TypeScript and runtime in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Teable or runtime?

Choose Teable if you want the larger community (21,859 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose runtime if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.