head to head · open source

Teable vs LockKnife

Teable has 21,856 GitHub stars, 1,354 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LockKnife has 542 stars, 120 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Teable leads on adoption by 3,932% (21,856 vs 542 stars). Teable is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; LockKnife is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Teable has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, LockKnife 22%. Teable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Teable ★ 22K LockKnife ★ 542 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Teable LockKnife
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 542
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 120
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Teable if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Teable profile →

pick LockKnife if

  • You want the LockKnife feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and LockKnife fits your workflow better

full LockKnife profile →

About Teable

Teable is a TypeScript based database and spreadsheet platform positioned as an open alternative to Retool and as an Airtable alternative. It combines PostgreSQL data management, AI workflows, app building, and team collaboration in one system, with a hosted version at teable.ai and self hosted options.

read the full Teable overview →

About LockKnife

LockKnife is a unified Android security research toolkit that gives forensic investigators, penetration testers, and reverse engineers a case driven TUI workspace and a headless CLI for extraction, credential recovery, APK analysis, runtime inspection, and reporting from one framework.

read the full LockKnife overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 271K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Teable vs ECC Teable vs react Teable vs Langflow Teable vs Supabase Teable vs puppeteer Teable vs archify Teable vs PocketBase Teable vs i-have-adhd Teable vs codebase-memory-mcp Teable vs herdr Teable vs ToolJet Teable vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is Teable or LockKnife more popular?

Teable has 21,856 GitHub stars and LockKnife has 542. Teable has the larger community by that measure.

Are Teable and LockKnife free?

Both are open source. Teable has no licence declared in this registry, and LockKnife is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Teable and LockKnife?

Teable is written in TypeScript and LockKnife in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Teable or LockKnife?

Choose Teable if you want the larger community (21,856 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose LockKnife if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.