head to head · open source

caveman vs Tabby

caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars, 6,789 forks, 155 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tabby has 33,921 stars, 1,793 forks, 335 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. caveman leads on adoption by 245% (116,900 vs 33,921 stars). caveman is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Tabby is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. caveman has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Tabby 5%. caveman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caveman ★ 117K Tabby ★ 34K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caveman Tabby
GitHub stars ★ 117K ★ 34K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-06-30
Forks ⑂ 6.8K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caveman if

  • You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caveman profile →

pick Tabby if

  • You want the Tabby feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Tabby fits your workflow better

full Tabby profile →

About caveman

why use many token when few do trick Your AI coding agent bills by the word and writes like it knows that. Caveman make it stop. ▶️ ThePrimeagen reacts: "No way this actually works" 🏆 1 on GitHub Trending · July 2026 · 🥇 1 Repository of the Day on Trendshift · April 2026 1 on Hacker News · 904 points · 366 comments · 8 Product of the Day on Product Hunt 📄 Cited in CAVEWOMAN , an Adobe Research paper that measured caveman style output cutting cost 1.4 to 2.4×, up to 3× · 🧪 Tested by JetBrains on 86 real coding tasks: "costs you nothing measurable in quality" ⚡ One command, no account, no API key. npx skills…

read the full caveman overview →

About Tabby

🐾 Tabby 📚 Docs • 💬 Slack • 🗺️ Roadmap English 简体中文 日本語 Tabby is a self hosted AI coding assistant, offering an open source and on premises alternative to GitHub Copilot. It boasts several key features: Self contained, with no need for a DBMS or cloud service. OpenAPI interface, easy to integrate with existing infrastructure (e.g Cloud IDE). Supports consumer grade GPUs. 🔥 What's New 12/12/2025 Get your GitHub issues implemented by connecting them to Pochi tasks and create PRs directly from the sidebar with a breakdown of CI/Lint/Test results vscode@0.20.0. 07/02/2025 v0.30 supports indexing GitLab Merge…

read the full Tabby overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Frequently asked questions

Is caveman or Tabby more popular?

caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars and Tabby has 33,921. caveman has the larger community by that measure.

Are caveman and Tabby free?

Both are open source. caveman is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Tabby has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between caveman and Tabby?

caveman is written in Go and Tabby in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caveman or Tabby?

Choose caveman if you want the larger community (116,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Tabby if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.