head to head · open source

strix vs akto

strix has 63,281 GitHub stars, 6,903 forks, 383 open issues and last shipped yesterday. akto has 1,516 stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. strix leads on adoption by 4,074% (63,281 vs 1,516 stars). strix is written in Python under Apache-2.0; akto is written in Java under MIT. strix has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, akto 19%. strix was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

strix ★ 63K akto ★ 1.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

strix akto
GitHub stars ★ 63K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 292
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick strix if

  • You weight community size — 63K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full strix profile →

pick akto if

  • You want the akto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and akto fits your workflow better

full akto profile →

About strix

Strix is an open source AI penetration testing tool that deploys autonomous AI agents against a running codebase to find, validate, and fix application vulnerabilities, built for developers and security teams who want dynamic security testing without the cost and scheduling overhead of manual pentesting.

read the full strix overview →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

strix vs shannon strix vs SkillSpector strix vs iFixAi strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs AI-Infra-Guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter strix vs nono strix vs CyberStrike strix vs AiSOC strix vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is strix or akto more popular?

strix has 63,281 GitHub stars and akto has 1,516. strix has the larger community by that measure.

Are strix and akto free?

Both are open source. strix is licensed under Apache-2.0 and akto under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between strix and akto?

strix is written in Python and akto in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, strix or akto?

Choose strix if you want the larger community (63,281 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose akto if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.