head to head · open source

storybook vs OpenContext

storybook has 91,428 GitHub stars, 10,495 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenContext has 1,280 stars, 84 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. storybook leads on adoption by 7,043% (91,428 vs 1,280 stars). storybook is written in TypeScript under MIT; OpenContext is written in JavaScript under MIT. storybook has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenContext 7%. storybook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

storybook ★ 91K OpenContext ★ 1.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

storybook OpenContext
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 1.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-06-16
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick storybook if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full storybook profile →

pick OpenContext if

  • You want the OpenContext feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenContext fits your workflow better

full OpenContext profile →

About storybook

Build bulletproof UI components faster Storybook is a frontend workshop for building UI components and pages in isolation. Thousands of teams use it for UI development, testing, and documentation. Find out more at storybook.js.org ! View README for: Table of contents 🚀 Getting Started 📒 Projects 🛠 Supported Frameworks & Examples 🔗Addons 🏅 Badges & Presentation materials 👥 Community 👏 Contributing 👨‍💻 Development scripts 💸 Sponsors 💵 Backers :memo: License Getting Started Visit Storybook's website to learn more about Storybook and to get started. Documentation Documentation can be found on Storybook's…

read the full storybook overview →

About OpenContext

Give your AI assistant a persistent memory. Stop repeating yourself. Start building smarter. Bring your own coding agent. OpenContext reuses your existing CLI (Codex/Claude/OpenCode) and adds a GUI + built in Skills/tools — no extra agent subscription. 🌐 Website · 📖 Usage Guide · ⬇️ Download Desktop 中文文档 The Problem When you use an AI assistant to build things, context gets lost (across days, repos, chats). You end up re explaining background, repeating decisions, and sometimes the assistant continues with the wrong assumptions. Most tools stop at storage and don't plug into the coding agent you already use…

read the full OpenContext overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

Frequently asked questions

Is storybook or OpenContext more popular?

storybook has 91,428 GitHub stars and OpenContext has 1,280. storybook has the larger community by that measure.

Are storybook and OpenContext free?

Both are open source. storybook is licensed under MIT and OpenContext under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between storybook and OpenContext?

storybook is written in TypeScript and OpenContext in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, storybook or OpenContext?

Choose storybook if you want the larger community (91,428 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenContext if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.