head to head · open source

Stoat vs AutomatedLab

Stoat has 3,336 GitHub stars, 388 forks, 139 open issues and last shipped today. AutomatedLab has 2,226 stars, 383 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Stoat leads on adoption by 50% (3,336 vs 2,226 stars). Stoat is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell under MIT. Stoat has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, AutomatedLab 17%. Stoat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Stoat ★ 3.3K AutomatedLab ★ 2.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Stoat AutomatedLab
GitHub stars ★ 3.3K ★ 2.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Rust PowerShell
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-07-06
Forks ⑂ 388 ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Stoat if

  • You weight community size — 3.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Stoat profile →

pick AutomatedLab if

  • You want the AutomatedLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PowerShell
  • You evaluated both and AutomatedLab fits your workflow better

full AutomatedLab profile →

About Stoat

Stoat is a Rust backend project that provides the services and libraries powering the Stoat group chat service. The repository is organized around core crates for configuration, database implementation, files, API models, permissions, presence, result types, and a coalesced crate.

read the full Stoat overview →

About AutomatedLab

AutomatedLab is an MIT licensed PowerShell provisioning framework that deploys complex lab environments — Windows domain controllers, Exchange, PKI, IIS and Linux guests — on Hyper V or Azure from simple scripts, built for IT admins, testers and trainers who need full multi VM labs on demand.

read the full AutomatedLab overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Stoat vs Puter Stoat vs Mattermost Stoat vs Signal Stoat vs Ente Stoat vs Element Stoat vs Fluxer Stoat vs certificates Stoat vs Tuta Stoat vs Zen Stoat vs Cinny Stoat vs Certipy Stoat vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Stoat or AutomatedLab more popular?

Stoat has 3,336 GitHub stars and AutomatedLab has 2,226. Stoat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Stoat and AutomatedLab free?

Both are open source. Stoat has no licence declared in this registry, and AutomatedLab is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Stoat and AutomatedLab?

Stoat is written in Rust and AutomatedLab in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Stoat or AutomatedLab?

Choose Stoat if you want the larger community (3,336 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose AutomatedLab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.