head to head · open source
srs vs galene
srs has 29,249 GitHub stars, 5,694 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. galene has 1,404 stars, 195 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. srs leads on adoption by 1,983% (29,249 vs 1,404 stars). srs is written in C++ under MIT; galene is written in Go under MIT. srs has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, galene 14%. srs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| srs | galene | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.7K | ⑂ 195 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick srs if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick galene if
- You want the galene feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and galene fits your workflow better
About srs
SRS (Simple Realtime Server) is an open source, AI driven real time media server written in C++ and released under the MIT license. It ingests and republishes live audio and video across a broad set of streaming protocols, including RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, HTTP TS, SRT, MPEG DASH, and GB28181. The project runs on Linux and macOS and is built for x86 64, ARMv7, AArch64, Apple M1, RISC V, LoongArch, and MIPS architectures. Codec support covers H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9, AAC, Opus, and G.711. The current line is SRS 8.0, and the project has been developed for roughly eleven years, with documentation published in b…
About galene
Galene is a videoconference server. It lives in the Go, WebRTC, SFU, video conferencing, file sharing, and webapp ecosystem. It is listed as Business Software / Collaboration & Communication. It is described as a fully featured, easy to deploy videoconferencing system requiring very moderate server resources. It gives browser users named groups, operator permissions, and file sharing. It solves the problem of running video meetings without a heavy hosted stack. It also supports extension, because the README points to client, protocol, and administrative API documents.
read the full galene overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is srs or galene more popular?
srs has 29,249 GitHub stars and galene has 1,404. srs has the larger community by that measure.
Are srs and galene free?
Both are open source. srs is licensed under MIT and galene under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between srs and galene?
srs is written in C++ and galene in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, srs or galene?
Choose srs if you want the larger community (29,249 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose galene if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.