head to head · open source

onedev vs SparkleShare

onedev has 15,257 GitHub stars, 979 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. SparkleShare has 4,979 stars, 569 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. onedev leads on adoption by 206% (15,257 vs 4,979 stars). onedev is written in Java under MIT; SparkleShare is written in C# under GPL-3.0. onedev has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, SparkleShare 11%. onedev was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (git), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

onedev ★ 15K SparkleShare ★ 5.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

onedev SparkleShare
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 5.0K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Java C#
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 979 ⑂ 569
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick onedev if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full onedev profile →

pick SparkleShare if

  • You want the SparkleShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and SparkleShare fits your workflow better

full SparkleShare profile →

About onedev

OneDev is a self hosted, MIT licensed development platform written in Java that unifies Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, Kanban boards, service desk, time tracking, packages, and CI/CD in one system, aimed at teams that run the whole development lifecycle on their own infrastructure.

read the full onedev overview →

About SparkleShare

SparkleShare is a free and open source file sharing and collaboration application written in C and released under the GNU GPLv3 or later, with its Sparkles library under the GNU LGPLv3 or later. It runs on Linux distributions, macOS, and Windows, and it lives in the desktop and self hosted cloud storage ecosystem alongside the Git and Git LFS tooling it depends on. The project has been on GitHub for roughly sixteen years, carries about 4,979 stars and 569 forks, and had its most recent push in September 2026.

read the full SparkleShare overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs onedev opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

onedev vs vibe-kanban onedev vs Wekan onedev vs qinglong onedev vs edict onedev vs OpenProject onedev vs Planka onedev vs Leantime onedev vs kanboard onedev vs Kaneo onedev vs ccpm onedev vs Fizzy onedev vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is onedev or SparkleShare more popular?

onedev has 15,257 GitHub stars and SparkleShare has 4,979. onedev has the larger community by that measure.

Are onedev and SparkleShare free?

Both are open source. onedev is licensed under MIT and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between onedev and SparkleShare?

onedev is written in Java and SparkleShare in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, onedev or SparkleShare?

Choose onedev if you want the larger community (15,257 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SparkleShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.