head to head · open source
Skyvern vs puppeteer-sharp
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppeteer-sharp has 3,934 stars, 483 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 493% (23,336 vs 3,934 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; puppeteer-sharp is written in C# under MIT. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, puppeteer-sharp 12%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (automation, puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | puppeteer-sharp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 483 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick puppeteer-sharp if
- You want the puppeteer-sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and puppeteer-sharp fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About puppeteer-sharp
Puppeteer Sharp [ ][NugetUrl] [ ][BuildUrl] [ ][BuildDemoUrl] [ ][Backers] [NugetUrl]: [BuildUrl]: [BuildDemoUrl]: [Backers]: Puppeteer Sharp is a .NET port of the official Node.JS Puppeteer API. Recent news Test the latest Firefox versions using WebDriver BiDi! Check the PuppeteerSharp 21 release notes. PuppeteerSharp now supports AOT compilation! Check the PuppeteerSharp 19 release notes!. Useful links API Documentation Slack channel puppeteer sharp StackOverflow Issues Blog Published Packages Prerequisites Puppeteer Sharp comes in two flavors: a NetStandard 2.0 library for .NET Framework 4.6.1 and .NET Core…
read the full puppeteer-sharp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or puppeteer-sharp more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and puppeteer-sharp has 3,934. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and puppeteer-sharp free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and puppeteer-sharp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and puppeteer-sharp?
Skyvern is written in Python and puppeteer-sharp in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or puppeteer-sharp?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose puppeteer-sharp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.