head to head · open source
Skyvern vs pdf_oxide
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pdf_oxide has 1,163 stars, 149 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 1,907% (23,336 vs 1,163 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 13%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | pdf_oxide | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 149 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pdf_oxide if
- You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About pdf_oxide
PDFOxide The Fastest PDF Toolkit for 20 Languages — Python, Rust, Go, JS/TS, C , Java, Kotlin, Swift, C++ & more, plus CLI & AI New in v0.3.69 — eleven new language bindings. PDFOxide now ships idiomatic bindings for C++, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, R, Julia, Zig, Scala, Clojure, Objective C, and Elixir , each built over the stable C ABI with its own CI workflow, api coverage tests, and runnable examples. That brings the toolkit to 20 languages (Rust core + 19 bindings). Want another language? Open an issue and tell us. The fastest PDF library for text extraction, image extraction, and markdown conversion. A Rust core…
read the full pdf_oxide overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or pdf_oxide more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,163. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and pdf_oxide free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and pdf_oxide?
Skyvern is written in Python and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or pdf_oxide?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.