head to head · open source
Skyvern vs fredy
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fredy has 1,616 stars, 260 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 1,344% (23,336 vs 1,616 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; fredy is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, fredy 16%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | fredy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 260 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fredy if
- You want the fredy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and fredy fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About fredy
Website Demo Quick Start Docs Fredy 🏡 Your Self Hosted Real Estate Finder for Europe Fredy watches 24 real estate portals across 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭 🇪🇸 🇮🇹 🇵🇹 for you (e.g. Immoscout, Kleinanzeigen etc), drops duplicates across platforms, and notifies you via Slack, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Discord and more the moment a new listing appears. Searches are managed from a Web UI, and you never see the same listing twice. On top of the listing itself, Fredy answers the three questions a portal will not: What would this cost me? Enter your income, living costs and savings once, and every listing is measured against…
read the full fredy overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or fredy more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and fredy has 1,616. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and fredy free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and fredy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and fredy?
Skyvern is written in Python and fredy in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or fredy?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose fredy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.