head to head · open source
Skyvern vs firecrawl-mcp-server
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,761 stars, 927 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Skyvern leads on adoption by 201% (23,336 vs 7,761 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript under MIT. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, firecrawl-mcp-server 12%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | firecrawl-mcp-server | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 927 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick firecrawl-mcp-server if
- You want the firecrawl-mcp-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and firecrawl-mcp-server fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About firecrawl-mcp-server
Firecrawl MCP Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings Firecrawl to MCP compatible AI agents — search, scrape, and interact with the live web for clean, agent ready context. Big thanks to @vrknetha, @knacklabs for the initial implementation! Features Search the web and get full page content Search an index built for coding agents: GitHub issues, merged pull requests, READMEs, and docs Scrape any URL into clean, structured data Interact with pages — click, navigate, and operate Deep research with autonomous agent Automatic retries and rate limiting Cloud and self hosted support SSE support Play…
read the full firecrawl-mcp-server overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or firecrawl-mcp-server more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,761. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and firecrawl-mcp-server free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and firecrawl-mcp-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and firecrawl-mcp-server?
Skyvern is written in Python and firecrawl-mcp-server in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or firecrawl-mcp-server?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.