head to head · open source
Skyvern vs cadence
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars, 2,233 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cadence has 9,535 stars, 931 forks, 205 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 145% (23,336 vs 9,535 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; cadence is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Skyvern has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, cadence 10%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Skyvern | cadence | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 9.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 931 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Skyvern if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cadence if
- You want the cadence feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cadence fits your workflow better
About Skyvern
🐉 Automate Browser based workflows using LLMs and Computer Vision 🐉 Skyvern automates browser based workflows using LLMs and computer vision. It provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of playwright, as well as a no code workflow builder to help both technical and non technical users automate manual workflows on any website, replacing brittle or unreliable automation solutions. Traditional approaches to browser automations required writing custom scripts for websites, often relying on DOM parsing and XPath based interactions which would break whenever the website layouts changed…
read the full Skyvern overview →
About cadence
Cadence Cadence Workflow is an open source platform since 2017 for building and running scalable, fault tolerant, and long running workflows. This repository contains the core orchestration engine and tools including CLI, schema managment, benchmark and canary. Getting Started Cadence backend consists of multiple services, a database (Cassandra/MySQL/PostgreSQL) and optionally Kafka+Elasticsearch. As a user, you need a worker which contains your workflow implementation. Once you have Cadence backend and worker(s) running, you can trigger workflows by using SDKs or via CLI. 1. Start cadence backend components…
read the full cadence overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or cadence more popular?
Skyvern has 23,336 GitHub stars and cadence has 9,535. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.
Are Skyvern and cadence free?
Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cadence under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Skyvern and cadence?
Skyvern is written in Python and cadence in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Skyvern or cadence?
Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,336 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cadence if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.