head to head · open source

Skyvern vs cadence

Skyvern has 23,020 GitHub stars, 2,165 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cadence has 9,444 stars, 913 forks, 205 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Skyvern leads on adoption by 144% (23,020 vs 9,444 stars). Skyvern is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; cadence is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Skyvern has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, cadence 10%. Skyvern was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Skyvern ★ 23K cadence ★ 9.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Skyvern cadence
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 9.4K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 913
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Skyvern if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Skyvern profile →

pick cadence if

  • You want the cadence feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cadence fits your workflow better

full cadence profile →

About Skyvern

Skyvern is an open source Python project for automating browser based workflows with LLMs and computer vision. It lives in the browser automation and AI agent ecosystem, and it provides a Playwright compatible SDK that adds AI functionality on top of Playwright. The project also includes a no code workflow builder, so technical users can work through code while non technical users can define tasks through the interface.

read the full Skyvern overview →

About cadence

Cadence is an open source orchestration engine for running asynchronous, long running business logic in a fault tolerant way. Written in Go under the Apache 2.0 license, it lives in the distributed systems and workflow automation space, and the project has been open source since 2017. This repository holds the core engine plus supporting tools: the CLI, schema management, a benchmark suite, and a canary. Client libraries for Go and Java are official, while Python and Ruby SDKs come from the community, and iWF can be layered on top as a DSL framework.

read the full cadence overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs skyvern n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Skyvern vs n8n Skyvern vs Browser Use Skyvern vs frigate Skyvern vs Lightpanda Skyvern vs ProxmoxVE Skyvern vs ActivePieces Skyvern vs Automa Skyvern vs LiveKit Skyvern vs amis Skyvern vs Windmill Skyvern vs Botpress Skyvern vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is Skyvern or cadence more popular?

Skyvern has 23,020 GitHub stars and cadence has 9,444. Skyvern has the larger community by that measure.

Are Skyvern and cadence free?

Both are open source. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cadence under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Skyvern and cadence?

Skyvern is written in Python and cadence in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Skyvern or cadence?

Choose Skyvern if you want the larger community (23,020 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cadence if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.