head to head · open source

shannon vs code-on-incus

shannon has 48,105 GitHub stars, 5,515 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. code-on-incus has 720 stars, 62 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. shannon leads on adoption by 6,581% (48,105 vs 720 stars). shannon is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; code-on-incus is written in Go under MIT. shannon has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, code-on-incus 9%. code-on-incus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

shannon ★ 48K code-on-incus ★ 720 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

shannon code-on-incus
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 720
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick shannon if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full shannon profile →

pick code-on-incus if

  • You want the code-on-incus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and code-on-incus fits your workflow better

full code-on-incus profile →

About shannon

Shannon is an autonomous AI pentester for web applications and APIs that reads an application's source code, identifies attack paths, and executes real exploits so that only vulnerabilities with a working proof of concept are reported, built for AppSec, DevSecOps, and security engineering teams that ship code continuously.

read the full shannon overview →

About code-on-incus

code on incus (coi) is an MIT licensed Go tool that runs AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, and omp inside their own isolated Incus system containers — full Linux machines with root, systemd, and Docker — and adds kernel level active defense that pauses or kills the container when it detects dangerous behavior, for developers who need real machine access without exposing the host or their credentials.

read the full code-on-incus overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

shannon vs strix shannon vs SkillSpector shannon vs iFixAi shannon vs codex-security shannon vs garak shannon vs AI-Infra-Guard shannon vs giskard-oss shannon vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter shannon vs nono shannon vs CyberStrike shannon vs AiSOC shannon vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is shannon or code-on-incus more popular?

shannon has 48,105 GitHub stars and code-on-incus has 720. shannon has the larger community by that measure.

Are shannon and code-on-incus free?

Both are open source. shannon is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and code-on-incus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between shannon and code-on-incus?

shannon is written in TypeScript and code-on-incus in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, shannon or code-on-incus?

Choose shannon if you want the larger community (48,105 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose code-on-incus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.