head to head · open source
Scrapling vs wreq
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq has 1,092 stars, 140 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 8,382% (92,628 vs 1,092 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; wreq is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, wreq 13%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | wreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 140 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq if
- You want the wreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wreq fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About wreq
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Rust HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities. Features Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Tower Middleware WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL HTTP/2 over TLS Parity Certificate Store (CAs & mTLS) Multiple Runtime (Tokio, Compio) Example The following example uses the…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or wreq more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and wreq has 1,092. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and wreq free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and wreq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and wreq?
Scrapling is written in Python and wreq in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or wreq?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose wreq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.