head to head · open source

Scrapling vs webmagic

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars, 8,307 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. webmagic has 11,676 stars, 4,100 forks, 367 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 601% (81,798 vs 11,676 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; webmagic is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, webmagic 35%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 82K webmagic ★ 12K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling webmagic
GitHub stars ★ 82K ★ 12K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-14 2025-12-20
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 4.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick webmagic if

  • You want the webmagic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and webmagic fits your workflow better

full webmagic profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About webmagic

WebMagic is an open source web crawler framework written in Java and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Java ecosystem and is distributed through Maven Central as the us.codecraft:webmagic core and us.codecraft:webmagic extension artifacts. The project describes itself as a scalable crawler framework that covers the whole lifecycle of a crawler: downloading, URL management, content extraction, and persistence. Its architecture was written with reference to Scrapy, the Python crawler framework, and it has been maintained for roughly thirteen years, with the most recent push in December 2025.…

read the full webmagic overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K ClickHouse ★ 50K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs scrapy scrapling vs easyspider scrapling vs changedetection-io scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly Scrapling vs stagehand Scrapling vs proxy_pool Scrapling vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or webmagic more popular?

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars and webmagic has 11,676. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and webmagic free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and webmagic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and webmagic?

Scrapling is written in Python and webmagic in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or webmagic?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,798 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose webmagic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.