head to head · open source
Scrapling vs webmagic
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webmagic has 11,670 stars, 4,085 forks, 367 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 694% (92,628 vs 11,670 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; webmagic is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, webmagic 35%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | webmagic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 12K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 4.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webmagic if
- You want the webmagic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and webmagic fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About webmagic
Readme in Chinese A scalable crawler framework. It covers the whole lifecycle of crawler: downloading, url management, content extraction and persistent. It can simplify the development of a specific crawler. Features: Simple core with high flexibility. Simple API for html extracting. Annotation with POJO to customize a crawler, no configuration. Multi thread and Distribution support. Easy to be integrated. Install: Add dependencies to your pom.xml: WebMagic use slf4j with slf4j log4j12 implementation. If you customized your slf4j implementation, please exclude slf4j log4j12. Get Started: First crawler: Write a…
read the full webmagic overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or webmagic more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and webmagic has 11,670. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and webmagic free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and webmagic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and webmagic?
Scrapling is written in Python and webmagic in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or webmagic?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose webmagic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.