head to head · open source
Scrapling vs scrapecraft
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. scrapecraft has 724 stars, 116 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 12,694% (92,628 vs 724 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; scrapecraft is written in Python under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, scrapecraft 16%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai, automation, data-extraction, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | scrapecraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 724 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick scrapecraft if
- You want the scrapecraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and scrapecraft fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About scrapecraft
ScrapeCraft AI Powered Web Scraping Editor ScrapeCraft is a web based scraping editor similar to Cursor but specialized for web scraping. It uses AI assistance to help users build scraping pipelines with the ScrapeGraphAI API. Features 🤖 AI powered assistant using OpenRouter (Kimi k2 model) 🔗 Multi URL bulk scraping support 📋 Dynamic schema definition with Pydantic 💻 Python code generation with async support 🚀 Real time WebSocket streaming 📊 Results visualization (table & JSON views) 🔄 Auto updating deployment with Watchtower Tech Stack Backend : FastAPI, LangGraph, ScrapeGraphAI Frontend : React…
read the full scrapecraft overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or scrapecraft more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and scrapecraft has 724. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and scrapecraft free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and scrapecraft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and scrapecraft?
Scrapling is written in Python and scrapecraft in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or scrapecraft?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose scrapecraft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.