head to head · open source

Scrapling vs pdf_oxide

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars, 8,307 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. pdf_oxide has 1,033 stars, 129 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 7,818% (81,798 vs 1,033 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 12%. pdf_oxide was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-extraction), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 82K pdf_oxide ★ 1.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling pdf_oxide
GitHub stars ★ 82K ★ 1.0K
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick pdf_oxide if

  • You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better

full pdf_oxide profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About pdf_oxide

PDFOxide is a Rust core PDF toolkit with bindings for nineteen additional languages, plus a command line tool and an MCP server, aimed at developers and data teams that need fast, permissively licensed text extraction, image extraction, markdown conversion, and PDF creation and editing.

read the full pdf_oxide overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K ClickHouse ★ 50K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs scrapy scrapling vs easyspider scrapling vs changedetection-io scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly Scrapling vs stagehand Scrapling vs proxy_pool Scrapling vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or pdf_oxide more popular?

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,033. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and pdf_oxide free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and pdf_oxide?

Scrapling is written in Python and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or pdf_oxide?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,798 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.