head to head · open source
Scrapling vs pdf_oxide
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pdf_oxide has 1,156 stars, 147 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 7,913% (92,628 vs 1,156 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 13%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-extraction), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | pdf_oxide | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 147 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pdf_oxide if
- You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About pdf_oxide
PDFOxide The Fastest PDF Toolkit for 20 Languages — Python, Rust, Go, JS/TS, C , Java, Kotlin, Swift, C++ & more, plus CLI & AI New in v0.3.69 — eleven new language bindings. PDFOxide now ships idiomatic bindings for C++, Swift, Kotlin, Dart, R, Julia, Zig, Scala, Clojure, Objective C, and Elixir , each built over the stable C ABI with its own CI workflow, api coverage tests, and runnable examples. That brings the toolkit to 20 languages (Rust core + 19 bindings). Want another language? Open an issue and tell us. The fastest PDF library for text extraction, image extraction, and markdown conversion. A Rust core…
read the full pdf_oxide overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or pdf_oxide more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,156. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and pdf_oxide free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and pdf_oxide?
Scrapling is written in Python and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or pdf_oxide?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.