head to head · open source
Scrapling vs httpcloak
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. httpcloak has 1,356 stars, 97 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 6,731% (92,628 vs 1,356 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; httpcloak is written in Go under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, httpcloak 7%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | httpcloak | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick httpcloak if
- You want the httpcloak feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and httpcloak fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About httpcloak
Every Byte of your Request Indistinguishable from Chrome. 📖 Full documentation at httpcloak.dev The Problem Bot detection doesn't just check your User Agent anymore. It fingerprints your TLS handshake . Your HTTP/2 frames . Your QUIC parameters . The order of your headers. Whether your SNI is encrypted. One mismatch = blocked. The Solution That's it. Full browser transport layer fingerprint. What Gets Emulated 🔐 TLS Layer JA3 / JA4 fingerprints GREASE randomization Post quantum X25519MLKEM768 ECH (Encrypted Client Hello) 🚀 Transport Layer HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames WINDOW UPDATE values Stream priorities (HPACK)…
read the full httpcloak overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or httpcloak more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and httpcloak has 1,356. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and httpcloak free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and httpcloak under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and httpcloak?
Scrapling is written in Python and httpcloak in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or httpcloak?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose httpcloak if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.