head to head · open source

Scrapling vs firecrawl-mcp-server

Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,751 stars, 926 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 1,095% (92,628 vs 7,751 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, firecrawl-mcp-server 12%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (mcp, mcp-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 93K firecrawl-mcp-server ★ 7.8K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling firecrawl-mcp-server
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 7.8K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 9.8K ⑂ 926
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick firecrawl-mcp-server if

  • You want the firecrawl-mcp-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and firecrawl-mcp-server fits your workflow better

full firecrawl-mcp-server profile →

About Scrapling

Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…

read the full Scrapling overview →

About firecrawl-mcp-server

Firecrawl MCP Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings Firecrawl to MCP compatible AI agents — search, scrape, and interact with the live web for clean, agent ready context. Big thanks to @vrknetha, @knacklabs for the initial implementation! Features Search the web and get full page content Search an index built for coding agents: GitHub issues, merged pull requests, READMEs, and docs Scrape any URL into clean, structured data Interact with pages — click, navigate, and operate Deep research with autonomous agent Automatic retries and rate limiting Cloud and self hosted support SSE support Play…

read the full firecrawl-mcp-server overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or firecrawl-mcp-server more popular?

Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,751. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and firecrawl-mcp-server free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and firecrawl-mcp-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and firecrawl-mcp-server?

Scrapling is written in Python and firecrawl-mcp-server in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or firecrawl-mcp-server?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.