head to head · open source
Scrapling vs faster-than-requests
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. faster-than-requests has 1,127 stars, 89 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 8,119% (92,628 vs 1,127 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; faster-than-requests is written in Nim under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, faster-than-requests 8%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | faster-than-requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Nim |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 89 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick faster-than-requests if
- You want the faster-than-requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Nim
- You evaluated both and faster-than-requests fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About faster-than-requests
Faster than Requests Lines Of Code counted using CLOC. Direct dependencies of the package when ready to run. Benchmarks run on Docker from Dockerfile on this repo. Developers counted from the Contributors list of Git. Speed is IRL time to complete 10000 HTTP local requests. Stats as of year 2020. x86 64 64Bit AMD, SSD, Arch Linux. Use Table Of Contents get() Description: Takes an URL string, makes an HTTP GET and returns a dict with the response. Arguments: url the remote URL, string type, required, must not be empty string, example user agent User Agent, string type, optional, should not be empty string. max…
read the full faster-than-requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or faster-than-requests more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and faster-than-requests has 1,127. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and faster-than-requests free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and faster-than-requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and faster-than-requests?
Scrapling is written in Python and faster-than-requests in Nim. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or faster-than-requests?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose faster-than-requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.