head to head · open source
Scrapling vs design-extract
Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars, 8,326 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. design-extract has 4,117 stars, 348 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 1,890% (81,917 vs 4,117 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; design-extract is written in HTML under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, design-extract 8%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | design-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 82K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.3K | ⑂ 348 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-extract if
- You want the design-extract feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and design-extract fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.
read the full Scrapling overview →
About design-extract
Built by Manav Arya Singh ( @Manavarya09 ) Sponsors Atlas Cloud — powers OpenAI compatible smart classification. For AI coding workflows, try the Atlas Cloud coding plan . Bloome — deploys your AI clone to handle every audience conversation, running in the cloud, 24/7. Try designlang on Bloome . designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM. One command emits 17+ files — DTCG tokens, Tailwind config, shadcn theme, Figma variables, motion tokens, typed component anatomy, brand voice, page intent labels, and a paste ready prompt pack for v0 / Lovable / Cursor / Claude …
read the full design-extract overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or design-extract more popular?
Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars and design-extract has 4,117. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and design-extract free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and design-extract under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and design-extract?
Scrapling is written in Python and design-extract in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or design-extract?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,917 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose design-extract if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.