head to head · open source
Scrapling vs design-extract
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. design-extract has 4,466 stars, 385 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 1,974% (92,628 vs 4,466 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; design-extract is written in HTML under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, design-extract 9%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | design-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-extract if
- You want the design-extract feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and design-extract fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About design-extract
Built by Manav Arya Singh ( @Manavarya09 ) Sponsors Atlas Cloud — powers OpenAI compatible smart classification. For AI coding workflows, try the Atlas Cloud coding plan . Bloome — deploys your AI clone to handle every audience conversation, running in the cloud, 24/7. Try designlang on Bloome . designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM. One command emits 17+ files — DTCG tokens, Tailwind config, shadcn theme, Figma variables, motion tokens, typed component anatomy, brand voice, page intent labels, and a paste ready prompt pack for v0 / Lovable / Cursor / Claude…
read the full design-extract overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or design-extract more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and design-extract has 4,466. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and design-extract free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and design-extract under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and design-extract?
Scrapling is written in Python and design-extract in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or design-extract?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose design-extract if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.