head to head · open source
Scrapling vs cariddi
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cariddi has 3,811 stars, 344 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 2,331% (92,628 vs 3,811 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; cariddi is written in Go under GPL-3.0. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cariddi 9%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (crawler, crawling), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | cariddi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 344 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cariddi if
- You want the cariddi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cariddi fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About cariddi
Take a list of domains, crawl urls and scan for endpoints, secrets, api keys, file extensions, tokens and more Coded with 💙 by edoardottt Share on Twitter! Install • Usage • Get Started • Changelog • Contributing • License Installation 📡 Homebrew Snap Golang Pacman NixOS Building from source You need Go ( =1.24.0) Building from source for Linux and Windows Linux One liner: git clone && cd cariddi && go get ./... && make linux Windows Note that the executable works only in cariddi folder. Usage 💡 If you want to scan only a single target you can use With multiple targets you can use a file instead, e.g…
read the full cariddi overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or cariddi more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and cariddi has 3,811. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and cariddi free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and cariddi under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and cariddi?
Scrapling is written in Python and cariddi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or cariddi?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose cariddi if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.