head to head · open source
Scrapling vs browserless
Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars, 8,326 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. browserless has 1,835 stars, 91 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scrapling leads on adoption by 4,364% (81,917 vs 1,835 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; browserless is written in JavaScript under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, browserless 5%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | browserless | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 82K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.3K | ⑂ 91 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick browserless if
- You want the browserless feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and browserless fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.
read the full Scrapling overview →
About browserless
The headless Chrome/Chromium driver on top of Puppeteer. Highlights Installation Usage The cloud API solution CLI Initializing a browser .constructor(options) .createContext(options) .browser() .respawn() .close() Built in .html(url, options) .text(url, options) .pdf(url, options) .screenshot(url, options) .destroyContext(options) .getDevice(options) .evaluate(fn, gotoOpts) .goto(page, options) .context() [.withPage(fn, \[options\])]( withpagefn options) [.page(\[name\])]( pagename) Extended ai function lighthouse screencast Packages FAQ License Highlights Compatible with Puppeteer API (text, screenshot, html, pd…
read the full browserless overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or browserless more popular?
Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars and browserless has 1,835. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and browserless free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and browserless under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and browserless?
Scrapling is written in Python and browserless in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or browserless?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,917 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose browserless if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.