head to head · open source

Scrapling vs auto-browser

Scrapling has 85,968 GitHub stars, 8,803 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. auto-browser has 900 stars, 152 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 9,452% (85,968 vs 900 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; auto-browser is written in Python under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, auto-browser 17%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (mcp, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 86K auto-browser ★ 900 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling auto-browser
GitHub stars ★ 86K ★ 900
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 8.8K ⑂ 152
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 86K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick auto-browser if

  • You want the auto-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and auto-browser fits your workflow better

full auto-browser profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About auto-browser

Auto Browser is an open source, MCP native browser control plane that gives AI agents and MCP clients a real Playwright driven browser with human takeover, approvals, and local first deployment.

read the full auto-browser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 65K

Related comparisons

browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Browser Use Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs Lightpanda Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs page-agent Scrapling vs ArchiveBox Scrapling vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or auto-browser more popular?

Scrapling has 85,968 GitHub stars and auto-browser has 900. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and auto-browser free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and auto-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and auto-browser?

Scrapling is written in Python and auto-browser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or auto-browser?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (85,968 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose auto-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.