head to head · open source
Rocket.Chat vs xyne-spaces
Rocket.Chat has 46,375 GitHub stars, 14,093 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xyne-spaces has 826 stars, 575 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 5,514% (46,375 vs 826 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 70%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Rocket.Chat | xyne-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 826 |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-07 | 2026-11-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 575 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Rocket.Chat if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xyne-spaces if
- You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better
About Rocket.Chat
The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…
read the full Rocket.Chat overview →
About xyne-spaces
Xyne Spaces The org OS — your organization's context layer, with collaborative apps built around it. Real time, permission aware and built for agents. At the center: your org's context. Connectors bring in what your organization already knows — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 and more — normalised into a store built for records and retrieval, and served back to your people and your agents through permission aware org context APIs, so every caller gets exactly the slice they're allowed to see. Around that core sit the org apps — Call · Claw · Agentic Search · Automations · Customer Support Desk · Chat ·…
read the full xyne-spaces overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rocket.Chat or xyne-spaces more popular?
Rocket.Chat has 46,375 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 826. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are Rocket.Chat and xyne-spaces free?
Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and xyne-spaces is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and xyne-spaces?
Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or xyne-spaces?
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,375 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.