head to head · open source
Rocket.Chat vs Workadventure
Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Workadventure has 5,906 stars, 1,008 forks, 902 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 685% (46,361 vs 5,906 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Workadventure is written in TypeScript under a licence not recorded in this registry. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Workadventure 17%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Rocket.Chat | Workadventure | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 5.9K |
| License | Custom / other | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 1.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Rocket.Chat if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Workadventure if
- You want the Workadventure feature set and don't need the biggest community
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Workadventure fits your workflow better
About Rocket.Chat
The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…
read the full Rocket.Chat overview →
About Workadventure
WorkAdventure WorkAdventure is a platform that allows you to design fully customizable collaborative virtual worlds (metaverse). With your own avatar, you can interact spontaneously with your colleagues, clients, partners (using a video chat system , triggered when you approach someone). Imagine all types of immersive experiences (recruitments, onboarding, trainings, digital workplace, internal/external events) on desktop, mobile or tablet. The little plus? The platform is GDPR and open source ! See more features for your virtual office! Pricing for our SaaS version! Support our team! Community resources 1. Want…
read the full Workadventure overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rocket.Chat or Workadventure more popular?
Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and Workadventure has 5,906. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are Rocket.Chat and Workadventure free?
Neither Rocket.Chat nor Workadventure declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Workadventure?
Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Workadventure in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Workadventure?
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Workadventure if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.