head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs Signal

Rocket.Chat has 46,136 GitHub stars, 13,893 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped today. Signal has 29,356 stars, 6,889 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 57% (46,136 vs 29,356 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Signal is written in Kotlin under AGPL-3.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Signal 23%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K Signal ★ 29K category Business Software

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat Signal
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 29K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 6.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick Signal if

  • You want the Signal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Signal fits your workflow better

full Signal profile →

About Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About Signal

Signal Android is a secure messaging application for Android devices that delivers private communication via end to end encryption. Developed by Signal Messenger, LLC, it operates within the broader Signal ecosystem, which includes official iOS and desktop clients. The app uses mobile data or Wi Fi to send and receive encrypted messages, voice calls, and video calls without relying on traditional SMS or telephony infrastructure.

read the full Signal overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat rocket-chat vs cobalt rocket-chat vs mike plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Rocket.Chat vs Plane Rocket.Chat vs cobalt Rocket.Chat vs Buzz Rocket.Chat vs Jitsi Rocket.Chat vs srs Rocket.Chat vs Huly Rocket.Chat vs Zulip Rocket.Chat vs etherpad Rocket.Chat vs drawnix Rocket.Chat vs univer Rocket.Chat vs chat Rocket.Chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or Signal more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,136 GitHub stars and Signal has 29,356. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and Signal free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and Signal is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Signal?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Signal in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Signal?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,136 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Signal if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.