head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs partykit

Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars, 13,891 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. partykit has 5,710 stars, 200 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 708% (46,133 vs 5,710 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; partykit is written in TypeScript under MIT. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, partykit 4%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (collaboration, real-time), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K partykit ★ 5.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat partykit
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 5.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-29
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick partykit if

  • You want the partykit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and partykit fits your workflow better

full partykit profile →

About Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About partykit

PartyKit is an open source, MIT licensed TypeScript framework and cloud platform for building multiplayer and real time applications, aimed at developers who want to add collaborative or live features without operating real time infrastructure themselves.

read the full partykit overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat rocket-chat vs cobalt rocket-chat vs mike plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Rocket.Chat vs Plane Rocket.Chat vs cobalt Rocket.Chat vs Buzz Rocket.Chat vs Jitsi Rocket.Chat vs srs Rocket.Chat vs Huly Rocket.Chat vs Zulip Rocket.Chat vs etherpad Rocket.Chat vs drawnix Rocket.Chat vs univer Rocket.Chat vs chat Rocket.Chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or partykit more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars and partykit has 5,710. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and partykit free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and partykit is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and partykit?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and partykit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or partykit?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,133 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose partykit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.