head to head · open source
Rocket.Chat vs mirotalkc2c
Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars, 13,891 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalkc2c has 513 stars, 97 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 8,893% (46,133 vs 513 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mirotalkc2c is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, mirotalkc2c 19%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Rocket.Chat | mirotalkc2c | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 513 |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Rocket.Chat if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mirotalkc2c if
- You want the mirotalkc2c feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mirotalkc2c fits your workflow better
About Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.
read the full Rocket.Chat overview →
About mirotalkc2c
MiroTalk C2C is a self hosted, open source WebRTC application for one to one video calling that gives teams and operators private, browser based cam to cam conversations for consultations, coaching, support, and telehealth without handing media to a third party service.
read the full mirotalkc2c overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rocket.Chat or mirotalkc2c more popular?
Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars and mirotalkc2c has 513. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are Rocket.Chat and mirotalkc2c free?
Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and mirotalkc2c is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and mirotalkc2c?
Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and mirotalkc2c in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or mirotalkc2c?
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,133 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mirotalkc2c if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.