head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs Matterwiki

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Matterwiki has 2,093 stars, 174 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 2,115% (46,361 vs 2,093 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Matterwiki is written in JavaScript under MIT. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Matterwiki 8%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (collaboration, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K Matterwiki ★ 2.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat Matterwiki
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 2.1K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-05-20
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 174
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick Matterwiki if

  • You want the Matterwiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Matterwiki fits your workflow better

full Matterwiki profile →

About Rocket.Chat

The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About Matterwiki

:warning: Warning Expect some things to be broken as we're actively working on a stable v0.3.0 release. Although the master branch is expected to work fine, we'd suggest you to wait until everything is completed. If you'd like to help, drop in on any of the issues or pull requests, or email one of na[dot]nishantarora[at]gmail[dot]com hpkrishna07[at]gmail[dot]com You can also get a preview of the next version on the v0.3.0 / refactor branches What is a wiki? A website or database developed collaboratively by a community of users, allowing any user to add and edit content. Example: Wikipedia Why do you need a…

read the full Matterwiki overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or Matterwiki more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and Matterwiki has 2,093. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and Matterwiki free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and Matterwiki is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Matterwiki?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Matterwiki in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Matterwiki?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Matterwiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.