head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs hedgedoc

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hedgedoc has 7,502 stars, 613 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 518% (46,361 vs 7,502 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; hedgedoc is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, hedgedoc 8%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (collaboration, hacktoberfest, real-time), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K hedgedoc ★ 7.5K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat hedgedoc
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 7.5K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 613
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick hedgedoc if

  • You want the hedgedoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and hedgedoc fits your workflow better

full hedgedoc profile →

About Rocket.Chat

The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About hedgedoc

[![ HedgeDoc on matrix.org][matrix.org image]][matrix.org url] [![version][github version badge]][github release page] [![POEditor][poeditor image]][poeditor url] [![Mastodon][social mastodon image]][social mastodon] ![REUSE Compliance Check][reuse workflow badge] [![codecov][codecov badge]][codecov url] HedgeDoc lets you create real time collaborative markdown notes. Getting Started ℹ️ Read all about HedgeDoc and the history of the project on our website 🧪 Try out HedgeDoc with the [demo instance][hedgedoc demo]. Check out the [features page][hedgedoc demo features]! 💽 Install HedgeDoc yourself using the…

read the full hedgedoc overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or hedgedoc more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and hedgedoc has 7,502. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and hedgedoc free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and hedgedoc is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and hedgedoc?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and hedgedoc in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or hedgedoc?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose hedgedoc if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.