head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs docker-jitsi-meet

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docker-jitsi-meet has 3,619 stars, 1,582 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 1,181% (46,361 vs 3,619 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; docker-jitsi-meet is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, docker-jitsi-meet 44%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K docker-jitsi-meet ★ 3.6K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat docker-jitsi-meet
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 3.6K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Lua
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-23
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick docker-jitsi-meet if

  • You want the docker-jitsi-meet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and docker-jitsi-meet fits your workflow better

full docker-jitsi-meet profile →

About Rocket.Chat

The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About docker-jitsi-meet

Jitsi Meet on Docker Jitsi is a set of Open Source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. Jitsi Meet is a fully encrypted, 100% Open Source video conferencing solution that you can use all day, every day, for free — with no account needed. This repository contains the necessary tools to run a Jitsi Meet stack on Docker using Docker Compose. All our images are published on the GitHub Container Registry (GHCR). Tags These are the currently published tags for all our images: Tag Description stable Points to the latest stable release stable NNNN X A stable release…

read the full docker-jitsi-meet overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or docker-jitsi-meet more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and docker-jitsi-meet has 3,619. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and docker-jitsi-meet free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and docker-jitsi-meet is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and docker-jitsi-meet?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and docker-jitsi-meet in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or docker-jitsi-meet?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose docker-jitsi-meet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.