head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs claude-share

Rocket.Chat has 46,299 GitHub stars, 14,025 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-share has 549 stars, 5 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 8,333% (46,299 vs 549 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; claude-share is written in TypeScript under MIT. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, claude-share 1%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K claude-share ★ 549 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat claude-share
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 549
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-23 2026-10-23
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 5
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick claude-share if

  • You want the claude-share feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and claude-share fits your workflow better

full claude-share profile →

About Rocket.Chat

The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About claude-share

Shared Sessions for Claude Code Work in the same Claude session with your team. Share a link, let a teammate join from their own Claude Code, and see each other's prompts, streamed replies and tool results. The host's machine does the work. Install · Try a first session · Full guide · Contribute Watch the 90 second demo on X or download the 8 second invitation clip. The clip shows an invitation arriving in Claude Desktop. Recorded with fictional teammates; demo details and music credit. Pair on a real task. A teammate joins your ongoing session with its shared history, then asks Claude to investigate the same…

read the full claude-share overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or claude-share more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,299 GitHub stars and claude-share has 549. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and claude-share free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and claude-share is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and claude-share?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and claude-share in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or claude-share?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,299 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose claude-share if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.