head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs blocksuite

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. blocksuite has 6,083 stars, 565 forks, 196 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 662% (46,361 vs 6,083 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; blocksuite is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, blocksuite 9%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K blocksuite ★ 6.1K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat blocksuite
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 6.1K
License Custom / other MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 565
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick blocksuite if

  • You want the blocksuite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and blocksuite fits your workflow better

full blocksuite profile →

About Rocket.Chat

The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About blocksuite

BlockSuite Overview People who are really serious about editor should make their own framework. BlockSuite is a toolkit for building editors and collaborative applications. It implements a series of content editing infrastructures, UI components and editors independently. You can consider BlockSuite as a UI component library for building various editors, based on a minimized vanilla framework as their runtime. With BlockSuite, you can: Reuse multiple first party BlockSuite editors: PageEditor : A comprehensive block based document editor, offering extensive customization and flexibility. EdgelessEditor : A…

read the full blocksuite overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or blocksuite more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and blocksuite has 6,083. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and blocksuite free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and blocksuite is licensed under MPL-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and blocksuite?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and blocksuite in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or blocksuite?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose blocksuite if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.