head to head · open source
redoc vs RWKV-Runner
redoc has 25,998 GitHub stars, 2,406 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. RWKV-Runner has 6,498 stars, 594 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped yesterday. redoc leads on adoption by 300% (25,998 vs 6,498 stars). redoc is written in TypeScript under MIT; RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT. redoc has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, RWKV-Runner 9%. RWKV-Runner was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| redoc | RWKV-Runner | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 6.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 594 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick redoc if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick RWKV-Runner if
- You want the RWKV-Runner feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and RWKV-Runner fits your workflow better
About redoc
Learn what's coming in Redoc 3.x → Generate beautiful API documentation from OpenAPI About Redoc Redoc is an open source tool for generating documentation from OpenAPI (formerly Swagger) definitions. By default Redoc offers a three panel, responsive layout: The left panel contains a search bar and navigation menu. The central panel contains the documentation. The right panel contains request and response examples. Live demo If you want to see how Redoc renders your OpenAPI definition, you can try it out online at A version of the Swagger Petstore API is displayed by default. To test it with your own OpenAPI…
read the full redoc overview →
About RWKV-Runner
RWKV Runner This project aims to eliminate the barriers of using large language models by automating everything for you. All you need is a lightweight executable program of just a few megabytes. Additionally, this project provides an interface compatible with the OpenAI API, which means that every ChatGPT client is an RWKV client. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [![py version][py version image]][py version url] English 简体中文 日本語 Install [![Windows][Windows image]][Windows url] [![MacOS][MacOS image]][MacOS url] [![Linux][Linux image]][Linux url] FAQs Preview…
read the full RWKV-Runner overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is redoc or RWKV-Runner more popular?
redoc has 25,998 GitHub stars and RWKV-Runner has 6,498. redoc has the larger community by that measure.
Are redoc and RWKV-Runner free?
Both are open source. redoc is licensed under MIT and RWKV-Runner under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between redoc and RWKV-Runner?
redoc is written in TypeScript and RWKV-Runner in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, redoc or RWKV-Runner?
Choose redoc if you want the larger community (25,998 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose RWKV-Runner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.