head to head · open source

redoc vs Docs

redoc has 25,915 GitHub stars, 2,397 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Docs has 16,830 stars, 636 forks, 370 open issues and last shipped yesterday. redoc leads on adoption by 54% (25,915 vs 16,830 stars). redoc is written in TypeScript under MIT; Docs is written in Python under MIT. redoc has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Docs 4%. Docs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reactjs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

redoc ★ 26K Docs ★ 17K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

redoc Docs
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 17K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 636
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick redoc if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full redoc profile →

pick Docs if

  • You want the Docs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Docs fits your workflow better

full Docs profile →

About redoc

Redoc is an open source tool for generating API reference documentation from OpenAPI definitions, formerly known as Swagger. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, ships under the MIT license, and is published on npm as the redoc package. By default it renders a responsive three panel layout: a left panel holding the search bar and navigation menu, a central panel holding the documentation itself, and a right panel showing request and response examples.

read the full redoc overview →

About Docs

Docs is an open source collaborative text editor for creating, editing, and sharing documents in real time. It lives in the open source documentation and knowledge base ecosystem, and it is built with Django and React for web native use. The repository describes Docs as a web native editor made for teams that need clean documents and sub documents without surrendering data to a hosted service.

read the full Docs overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

redoc vs fastapi redoc vs Hoppscotch redoc vs Bruno redoc vs Insomnia redoc vs one-api redoc vs OpenAPI-Specification redoc vs openapi-generator redoc vs SafeLine redoc vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF redoc vs grpc-gateway redoc vs Yaak redoc vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is redoc or Docs more popular?

redoc has 25,915 GitHub stars and Docs has 16,830. redoc has the larger community by that measure.

Are redoc and Docs free?

Both are open source. redoc is licensed under MIT and Docs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between redoc and Docs?

redoc is written in TypeScript and Docs in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, redoc or Docs?

Choose redoc if you want the larger community (25,915 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Docs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.