head to head · open source

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs reconftw

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,230 GitHub stars, 4,033 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. reconftw has 8,138 stars, 1,235 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 308% (33,230 vs 8,138 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; reconftw is written in Shell under MIT. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, reconftw 15%. reconftw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K reconftw ★ 8.1K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills reconftw
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 8.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Shell
Last push 2026-08-31 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 4.0K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills profile →

pick reconftw if

  • You want the reconftw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and reconftw fits your workflow better

full reconftw profile →

About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is an Apache 2.0 Python library of 817 structured cybersecurity skills that gives AI agents the working knowledge of a senior security analyst, aimed at security teams, DevSecOps engineers, and red or blue teams that already run agents such as Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, or Gemini CLI.

read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →

About reconftw

reconFTW is an automated reconnaissance framework, written in Shell under the MIT licence, that runs a curated chain of security tools against a target domain to enumerate subdomains and hosts, gather OSINT, analyse web surfaces, and check for vulnerabilities; it is built for security researchers, penetration testers, and bug bounty hunters.

read the full reconftw overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs PayloadsAllTheThings Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs ProjectDiscovery Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs pentagi Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs PentestGPT Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Osintgram Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs thc-hydra Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs vuls Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs osv-scanner Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs rengine Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Nettacker Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs afrog

Frequently asked questions

Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or reconftw more popular?

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,230 GitHub stars and reconftw has 8,138. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.

Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and reconftw free?

Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and reconftw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and reconftw?

Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and reconftw in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or reconftw?

Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (33,230 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose reconftw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.