head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs Osintgram
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,530 GitHub stars, 4,327 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Osintgram has 15,409 stars, 3,253 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 131% (35,530 vs 15,409 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Osintgram is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Osintgram 21%. Osintgram was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | Osintgram | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 15K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 3.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Osintgram if
- You want the Osintgram feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Osintgram fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills The largest open source cybersecurity skills library for AI agents 818 production grade cybersecurity skills · 34 security domains · 6 framework mappings · 26+ AI platforms Get Started · What's Inside · Frameworks · Platforms · Contributing ⚠️ Community Project — This is an independent, community created project. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC. 🔐 Authorized & lawful use only. This library includes offensive and dual use techniques (e.g. red team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation) intended for authorized penetration testing, security research, defense, and education . Only…
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About Osintgram
Osintgram 🔎📸 Point it at an Instagram account and find out who's behind it. Osintgram collects, cross references and lays out everything a public profile gives away — followers, captions, hashtags, geotagged locations, posting habits, public contact details — in a web interface you run on your own machine. Ask in plain language and a local AI model figures out which lookups to run. Or don't: pick the commands yourself and skip the model entirely. Why you might like it It answers questions, not just commands. "How many followers do they have and which hashtags do they use most?" runs three lookups and comes…
read the full Osintgram overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or Osintgram more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 35,530 GitHub stars and Osintgram has 15,409. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and Osintgram free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Osintgram under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and Osintgram?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and Osintgram in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or Osintgram?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (35,530 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Osintgram if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.